Friday, April 11th 2014
Since reason stems from logic then,
the source of faith is logic. In the early ages, people were asking themselves
various questions. In order to answer these questions, they came up with the
idea of a spiritual world. After closely looking at different religions and the
applications of faith in other areas, I have come to realize that faith and
reason are not polar opposites. In fact, faith can be defined as the
conviction, or belief in something without material evidence. Through this
definition, we can assume that we have faith in our senses and in our memories
since we are relying on them in order to acquire our knowledge without any
evidence that they are reliable. As we have already seen in the unit of
perception, our memories and senses are actually fallible. Therefore, we must
have some faith in them in order to form our perceptual knowledge. We can also
use reason in order to prove that God actually exists. For example we can
disprove the paradox of suffering which rises the question “Why is there so
much suffering in the world if God is all knowing and all loving? We can
therefore use reason in order challenge this paradox and prove the existence of
God. First of all, according to Islam,
the world we are currently living in is temporary and therefore all the
suffering and atrocities will eventually come to an end. Those that are able to
follow the right path in this temporary world will discover an eternal world
where no suffering exists. In addition, if we acknowledge the fact that God has
implemented some physical and morale laws, it would make sense that he allows
suffering if a person does not adhere to these laws. If an innocent person
suffers, it could be to test his faith and commitment to his religion. Those
who are able to face this suffering and continue to believe in God despite
their misery would ascertain their faith to God and continue do-good deeds to
repent themselves. However, if one does not have faith, it would make sense for
him to respond to all the suffering through arguments against God. Therefore
both sides could use reason to prove whether God exists or not.
Another real
life situation where we could apply faith would be medicine. When we go to a
doctor, or take medicine to cure an illness, we are certain that our disease
will be cured. In this case we have faith in science since we trust the previous
scientific discoveries without having any evidence that these conclusions are
actually valid and that the scientist were competent. For example, how can we
know for sure that atoms actually exist as it is since no tool is precise
enough to see an atom? As a result, we need to have faith in the scientists
that came up with the atomic model. This causes a chain reaction since many
other scientific discoveries rely on the atomic model. As a result our faith in
the existence of atoms affects our whole belief in science and enables us to
acquire more knowledge. Finally, through these examples we can see that faith
and reason are not completely opposites as we can use reason to prove faith and
since faith can lead to further reasoning.
I totally agree with you about how we exercise faith in other realms of our daily lives - for example in the idea that atoms and sub-atomic particles exist - despite not having first hand knowledge of such things. However faith in doctors and scientists is not without evidence, is it? It is science that showed us how fallible sense perception is and took us beyond the evidence of our senses. Scientific theories will only be believed if they work. Anti-biotics cure infections, planes fly etc etc… For faith to be demonstrably effective, the lame would walk, spirits would address us from beyond the grave etc etc.. UNLESS we have a divine being that wants us NOT to have evidence so that we will know him/it ONLY through faith. This seems a bit strange to me since I have difficulty envisaging a creator that would make this a condition for entry into heaven.. What IS demonstrably true about faith is that it gives great comfort to those who believe, and a sense of purpose. However, it does not mean that faith claims are true. As to your argument about suffering as a necessity - it doesn't explain the deaths of children - does it?
ReplyDeleteYou are welcome to fact-check the following 2011 statistics...
Some 21,000 children die every day around the world due to poverty, hunger, and disease.
That is equivalent to:
1 child dying every 4 seconds
14 children dying every minute
A 2011 Libya conflict-scale death toll every day
A 2010 Haiti earthquake occurring every 10 days
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every 11 days
An Iraq-scale death toll every 19–46 days
Just under 7.6 million children dying every year
Some 92 million children dying between 2000 and 2010
http://www.globalissues.org/article/715/today-21000-children-died-around-the-world